Current:Home > ContactWisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid -SecureWealth Bridge
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid
View
Date:2025-04-15 13:01:38
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday on whether a law that legislators adopted more than a decade before the Civil War bans abortion and can still be enforced.
Abortion-rights advocates stand an excellent chance of prevailing, given that liberal justices control the court and one of them remarked on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights. Monday’s arguments are little more than a formality ahead of a ruling, which is expected to take weeks.
Wisconsin lawmakers passed the state’s first prohibition on abortion in 1849. That law stated that anyone who killed a fetus unless the act was to save the mother’s life was guilty of manslaughter. Legislators passed statutes about a decade later that prohibited a woman from attempting to obtain her own miscarriage. In the 1950s, lawmakers revised the law’s language to make killing an unborn child or killing the mother with the intent of destroying her unborn child a felony. The revisions allowed a doctor in consultation with two other physicians to perform an abortion to save the mother’s life.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion nationwide nullified the Wisconsin ban, but legislators never repealed it. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe two years ago, conservatives argued that the Wisconsin ban was enforceable again.
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit challenging the law in 2022. He argued that a 1985 Wisconsin law that allows abortions before a fetus can survive outside the womb supersedes the ban. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, argues the 1849 ban should be enforceable. He contends that it was never repealed and that it can co-exist with the 1985 law because that law didn’t legalize abortion at any point. Other modern-day abortion restrictions also don’t legalize the practice, he argues.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled last year that the old ban outlaws feticide — which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother’s consent — but not consensual abortions. The ruling emboldened Planned Parenthood to resume offering abortions in Wisconsin after halting procedures after Roe was overturned.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court in February to overturn Schlipper’s ruling without waiting for lower appellate courts to rule first. The court agreed to take the case in July.
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin filed a separate lawsuit in February asking the state Supreme Court to rule directly on whether a constitutional right to abortion exists in the state. The court agreed in July to take that case as well. The justices have yet to schedule oral arguments.
Persuading the court’s liberal majority to uphold the ban appears next to impossible. Liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz stated openly during her campaign that she supports abortion rights, a major departure for a judicial candidate. Usually, such candidates refrain from speaking about their personal views to avoid the appearance of bias.
The court’s three conservative justices have accused the liberals of playing politics with abortion.
veryGood! (13476)
Related
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Erectile dysfunction is far more common than many realize. Here's how to treat it.
- Fever coach, players try to block out social media hate: 'It's really sad, isn't it?'
- Harrison Butker Breaks Silence on Commencement Speech Controversy
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Takeaways: How an right-wing internet broadcaster became Trump’s loyal herald
- Rescue efforts for canoeists who went over Minnesota waterfall continue; Guard deployed
- Bridgit Mendler Officially Graduates Harvard Law School and Her Future's Bright
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- List of winners at the 77th Cannes Film Festival
Ranking
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Jessica Biel and Justin Timberlake & More Couples Who Broke Up and Got Back Together
- A rare 6-planet alignment will occur next month. Here's what to know.
- Five-time WNBA All-Star understands Caitlin Clark's growing pains: 'Happens to all of us'
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Friday’s pre-holiday travel broke a record for the most airline travelers screened at US airports
- New York's A Book Place: Meet the charming bookstore that also hosts candle magic workshops
- Trump TV: Internet broadcaster beams the ex-president’s message directly to his MAGA faithful
Recommendation
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
Their school is about to close. Now, Birmingham-Southern heads to College World Series.
Lara Trump touts RNC changes and a 2024 presidential victory for Trump in North Carolina
Jeffrey Epstein, a survivor’s untold story and the complexity of abuse
Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
Leclerc takes pole position for Monaco GP and ends Verstappen’s bid for F1 record
What Travis Kelce, Hoda Kotb and More Have to Say About Harrison Butker's Controversial Speech
Friday’s pre-holiday travel broke a record for the most airline travelers screened at US airports