Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -SecureWealth Bridge
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-11 14:25:04
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Satellite photos analyzed by the AP show Israeli forces pushed further into Gaza late last week
- Liberia’s leader Weah is facing a tight runoff vote for a second term against challenger Boakai
- Mistrial declared for Texas officer in fatal shooting of an unarmed man
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Report Charts Climate Change’s Growing Impact in the US, While Stressing Benefits of Action
- UK inflation falls sharply to 4.6%, lowest level in 2 years
- This Texas woman divorced her husband to become his guardian. Now she cares for him — with her new husband
- Trump's 'stop
- An ethnic resistance group in northern Myanmar says an entire army battalion surrendered to it
Ranking
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Colombia begins sterilization of hippos descended from pets of drug kingpin Pablo Escobar
- Maine’s yellow flag law invoked more than a dozen times after deadly shootings
- Step Inside Travis Barker's Thanksgiving-Themed Birthday Party Hosted By Kourtney Kardashian
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Bradley Cooper on Maestro
- Some of the 40 workers trapped in India tunnel collapse are sick as debris and glitches delay rescue
- Jason Mraz calls coming out a 'divorce' from his former self: 'You carry a lot of shame'
Recommendation
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
UNESCO is criticized after Cambodia evicts thousands around World Heritage site Angkor Wat
Energy Department tries to boost US battery industry with another $3.5 billion in funding
Jury finds Wisconsin woman guilty of poisoning friend with eye drops
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
13-year-old Texas boy sentenced to prison for murder in fatal shooting at a Sonic Drive-In
North Carolina legislator Marcus won’t run for Senate in 2024 but is considering statewide office
Firefighters extinguish small Maui wildfire that broke out during wind warning