Current:Home > ScamsIllinois high court hands lawmakers a rare pension-overhaul victory -SecureWealth Bridge
Illinois high court hands lawmakers a rare pension-overhaul victory
View
Date:2025-04-17 10:28:05
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) — The Illinois Supreme Court on Friday endorsed the consolidation of local police and firefighter pension systems, a rare victory in a yearslong battle to find an answer to the state’s besieged retirement accounts.
The court’s unanimous opinion rejected claims by three dozen working and retired police officers and firefighters from across the state that the merger of 649 separate systems into two statewide accounts violated the state constitution’s guarantee that benefits “shall not be diminished or impaired.”
For years, that phrase has flummoxed governors and legislatures trying to cut their way past decades of underfunding the retirement programs. Statewide pension systems covering teachers, university employees, state employees, judges and those working for the General Assembly are $141 billion shy of what’s been promised those current and retired workers. In 2015, the Supreme Court overturned a lawmakers’ money-saving overhaul approved two years earlier.
Friday’s ruling deals with a law Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed in late 2019 intended to boost investment power and cut administrative spending for hundreds of municipal funds. The Democratic governor celebrated the unusually good pension news.
“We ushered in a new era of responsible fiscal management, one aspect of which has been consolidating over 600 local pension systems to increase returns and lower fees, reducing the burden on taxpayers,” Pritzker said in a statement.
It would appear to be working. As of 2021, the new statewide accounts together had a funding gap of $12.83 billion; a year later, it stood at $10.42 billion, a decline of 18.7%.
Additionally, data from the Firefighters’ Pension Investment Fund shows that through June 2023, the statewide fund had increased return value of $40.4 million while saving, through June 2022, $34 million in investment fees and expenses.
But 36 active and former first responders filed a lawsuit, claiming that the statewide arrangement had usurped control of their retirement benefits. They complained the law violated the pension-protection clause because they could no longer exclusively manage their investments, they no longer had a vote on who invested their money and what risks they were willing to take, and that the local funds had to pay for transitioning to the statewide program.
The court decreed that none of those issues concerned a benefit that was impaired. Beyond money, the pension-protection law only covers a member’s ability to continue participating or to increase service credits.
“The ability to vote in elections for local pension board members is not such a constitutionally protected benefit, nor is the ability to have local board members control and invest pension funds,” Chief Justice Mary Jane Theis said in writing the court’s opinion. The remaining six justices concurred.
Matters concerning benefits are still decided by remaining local boards, and the nine-member panels operating the statewide programs are a mix of executives from the member municipalities, current employees elected by other current employees, retirees elected by other beneficiaries and a representative of the Illinois Municipal League, the opinion noted.
The court also dismissed the plaintiffs’ contention that the law violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause which allows government to take property in return for just compensation. It decided the pension law involved no real property of the type the federal constitution envisioned.
House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch, a Democrat from the Chicago suburb of Hillside, called the measure a “commonsense reform” borne of collaboration.
“Smart decision making can produce real savings for taxpayers, while protecting what workers have earned,” Welch said in a statement. “We’re continuing to rebuild Illinois’ fiscal house and move our state forward.”
veryGood! (7)
Related
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Justin Timberlake announces free surprise concert in Memphis: 'Going home'
- Former LA County sheriff’s deputy pleads no contest to lesser charges in fatal on-duty shooting
- 'Get wild': Pepsi ad campaign pokes fun at millennial parents during NFL Wild Card weekend
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Kristen Stewart says 'Twilight' was 'such a gay movie'
- From Elvis to Lisa Marie Presley, Inside the Shocking Pileup of Tragedy in One Iconic Family
- Seal poses in rare appearance with 4 kids on 'Book of Clarence' red carpet: See the photo
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Sign bearing Trump’s name removed from Bronx golf course as new management takes over
Ranking
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- North Carolina Gov. Cooper gets temporary legal win in fight with legislature over board’s makeup
- Tom Holland Addresses Zendaya Breakup Rumors
- Pakistan effectively shuts the key crossing into Afghanistan to truck drivers
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Truck driver sentenced to a year in prison for crash that killed New Hampshire trooper
- Why This Is Selena Gomez’s Favorite Taylor Swift Song
- A British D-Day veteran celebrates turning 100, but the big event is yet to come
Recommendation
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
How much do surrogates make and cost? People describe the real-life dollars and cents of surrogacy.
Parents facing diaper duty could see relief from bipartisan tax legislation introduced in Kentucky
Kalen DeBoer's first assignment as Alabama football coach boils down to one word
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Pat McAfee. Aaron Rodgers. Culture wars. ESPN. Hypocrisy. Jemele Hill talks it all.
Alaska ombudsman says Adult Protective Services’ negligent handling of vulnerable adult led to death
Is Jay-Z's new song about Beyoncé? 'The bed ain't a bed without you'