Current:Home > StocksArizona Democrats poised to continue effort to repeal 1864 abortion ban -SecureWealth Bridge
Arizona Democrats poised to continue effort to repeal 1864 abortion ban
View
Date:2025-04-17 18:43:43
When asked Tuesday how she feels about the Democratic effort in the Arizona State Legislature to repeal an 1864 abortion ban before it goes into effect, Democratic state Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton laughed.
"I was told that we could get a clean repeal tomorrow, but you know, who knows, right?" Stahl Hamilton said. "Who knows who loses their nerve, you know, the night before the day? Or minutes before, you know? All I know is we got to keep trying. And people in Arizona need us to continue to do everything we can to repeal this ban."
Earlier this month, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that the highly-restrictive 160-year-old law that bans nearly all abortions can be enforced — blocking the procedure in all cases except to save the life of the mother. If allowed to take effect on June 8, it would supersede current law, which allows abortions up to 15 weeks of pregnancy.
Two previous attempts by Democrats to repeal the 1864 law by circumventing Republican House Speaker Ben Toma have failed to garner enough support for a vote on a rules change.
An April 17 effort to repeal the ban by means of a temporary rule change fell one vote short. With the support of two Senate Republicans, the upper chamber was able to make headway by getting a first reading of a repeal bill, but two more readings are required before it could be brought to a vote.
Toma has been a vocal critic of Democrats on abortion. In a statement released immediately after the Arizona Supreme Court decision, Toma said that the legislature would "take the time needed to listen to our constituents and carefully consider appropriate actions, rather than rush legislation on a topic of this magnitude without a larger discussion."
He also claimed in his statement that "under the Democrats' view, partial birth abortions would be allowed, and minors could get abortions on demand without parental consent or a court order," even though there is no indication that a repeal of the 160-year-old law would allow either.
Arizona Senate Democrats have cast doubt on the future of any repeal efforts moving forward in the House. Stahl Hamilton acknowledged that getting Republican support to repeal the ban is a tall task. Even though they seem to have the numbers to do so, she is concerned that at the last minute, minds will change.
Democratic state Sen. Eva Burch told CBS News that the Republican caucus in Arizona is fractured and cannot agree on how to address the prospect of a Civil War era abortion ban going into effect.
"I have no confidence at all that the repeal is going to go through, certainly not in the way that it should — not in the way that's being called for. We've already passed that point," Burch said.
"So do I think that they're going to come together and do the right thing?" Burch went on. "I don't have any faith that that's what's going to happen."
Democratic state Sen. Anna Hernandez also said she wasn't confident in the prospect of any repeal effort, but noted "anything can happen."
The legislature is set to meet Wednesday morning and once again attempt to address the issue.
Arizona Right to Life, an anti-abortion group, is calling on legislators to oppose those efforts, and plans on organizing at the state capitol as well.
- In:
- Arizona
- Abortion
Shawna Mizelle is a 2024 campaign reporter for CBS News.
Twitter InstagramveryGood! (3661)
Related
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Some Muslim Americans Turn To Faith For Guidance On Abortion
- State Clean Air Agencies Lose $112 Million in EPA Budget-Cutting
- A Trump-appointed Texas judge could force a major abortion pill off the market
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- At Davos, the Greta-Donald Dust-Up Was Hardly a Fair Fight
- A Longchamp Resurgence Is Upon Us: Shop the Iconic Le Pliage Tote Bags Without Paying Full Price
- The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Amazon Web Services outage leads to some sites going dark
Ranking
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Job Boom in Michigan, as Clean Energy Manufacturing Drives Economic Recovery
- Elle Fanning, Brie Larson and More Stars Shine at Cannes Film Festival 2023
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Save 69% On This Overnight Bag That’s Perfect for Summer Travel
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Look Back on Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo's Cutest Family Photos
- How Trump’s ‘Secret Science’ Rule Would Put Patients’ Privacy at Risk
- This winter's U.S. COVID surge is fading fast, likely thanks to a 'wall' of immunity
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Biden officials declined to offer legal status to hundreds of thousands of migrants amid border concerns
A sleeping man dreamed someone broke into his home. He fired at the intruder and shot himself, authorities say.
The Federal Reserve is pausing rate hikes for the first time in 15 months. Here's the financial impact.
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
To reignite the joy of childhood, learn to live on 'toddler time'
FDA expands frozen strawberries recall over possible hepatitis A contamination
The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore